Boho Shops In San Diego

A cappella ....?

I can not sleep. Ok, that can happen. Is no more bad, actually.
But I let myself be carried away too often times lengthy discussions. on particular topics to me at heart.
the last few nights I could not sleep more times. What does that mean? I have a lot of discussion. At night, when we should now actually sleep times, does it work best on the web. And the things my heart lie? Certain bands;)

And can discuss the best way about it still in Wise Guys Forum . Where "good" of course, is always a matter of opinion. There are already Just tons of (in my opinion) unnecessary discussions that revolve in a circle, simply because no one can see that there can be multiple opinions. And if a counter ( Wise Guys ) current floats, then he is like to "evil" and "not a real fan."
Ok, I'm definitely not a real Wise Guys fan anymore. But I once was. And so I was in the forum and have met many people who are very dear to me. So as I look around every now and then .
And by the range in which it also revolves around other groups (I'm against the "vs" because there really is comparable little, and it sounds too extreme to fight), namely this one: Wise Guys vs. other a-cappella ensemble , this blog is actually just beginning to emerge, because I think local "advertising reports for other populations may be because something was lack of place, or would have saved elsewhere.

Well, at least I drive myself there more often around , for there are now times, many people who are interested in, among other things for a cappella , and not all are of the opinion that only the Wise Guys are, and some can also contribute to their happiness convincing:) so I will not deny that my findings of course. And after
grad a Forum member, a new group had discovered it was, at once ne hot debate (or rather " explanatory round ") about the term "a cappella . And since I nu so much dedication dadrüben have put pure, sorting I here again for me. Can almost ne write bachelor thesis about it: D

So how come ?
" 2806 mb" wrote:

can properly compare it to with the wise guys not because the 14 men are, and the group changes depending on Unisituation. The only thing you can compare, I think so far, the beatboxer , and - this one has to say ienfach - Dän inserted loosely into the bag. If one considers now that the really good Dän can, you want to mean something.

This paragraph was in the room. And the interested reader will be able to imagine what my teacher has since awakened instinct ... The
beatboxer , exactly. Respectively. the Dänvergleich . And I was actually not the first. Not only do I believe that the Lord Dickopf has not been a major talent in this regard.

" Serena" wrote: no

Sorry, but. Of the professionals Dän offers in the Mouth - Percussion least. This has in fact any professional A cappella band that I know more expanded. (Somewhere in an interview he had once said that he does not want to step up. I still hope that he changes his mind about this time and more of a ...)

The lady I know this saying then even personally and am very happy to be with her because of one mind. So had support for them here. And I can not stop situation omit to show someone what it everything else is Sun
So I express my consent. More specifically, Dän has by far the weakest Beatbox I know. And I mark a whole bunch;)
And as I start this thing no longer the Wise Guys also just kind of compare. Mainly because there really seems no longer interested, there is expanding. And what can Dän nu slow even I know ...
I recommend you to convert broadcast times . Since you do not have time to actually Go abroad for . But as the beatboxer the Hous Jacks or Rockapella ... because it makes eyes (and ears), since even I can now and then still quite stand there with my mouth open and it really believe non ...

And after the reference to High Five and Viva Voce I've got to put my German favorites.
are especially Lukas and Patrick (and if he ran times may also Till ) of maybebop and muSix times simply because now even farther ahead with it.
This time the two small examples are:



In the context, then the terms Beatbox , Vocal Percussion , mouth percussion and drums thrown wildly that, yes, but at Ner superficial discussion also totally ok is, yes we all know what is meant. Then
is the opinion in the room that there is the music of the Wise Guys actually perhaps more likely to fit a rather "thin" drums have to ... her by my side, it is even really the case, because the rest is dependent for my taste very "thin". Ok, that sounds Fiess, but so ... after all they are consistent. And it also fits with my experience with Dän that he makes everything feel free to create and reluctantly accepts what from the outside or learn.
Well, suddenly stood but a distinction between "a cappella " and "vocal pop" in space.
you should know that the Wise Guys call themselves lately at concerts like vocal as popper , as if this is a new concept and grown on her crap.


" DeSoto " wrote:

Why exactly? The Wise Guys make its own claim but to no a capella more but Vocal-Pop. I think this is just stringent in development. The Wise Guys nunmal are a commercial band. It is what the German A-Capella bands - the U.S., we have equal time before the very outside - some of which sound quite different from the sounds, make of the songs are no longer beside her. And then goes to what the guys make beat moderate on their feet anyway. A rhythm instrument like a drum is nunmal a rhythm instrument and not an art form. Although I must also admit honestly, that acapelle just the acapella will I start little. Since my flat but are then much better. Since nix is gecovert as original songs are written that you do not just instruments. One could easily perform but also with music band.
What do the guys is simply pop music oihne instruments. And the requirement for Popsuisik we all know. Go easy on the ear and maintain. And if it is done well, like bein WG, it has in two years. Poor Pop music can be heard no longer listen to a few times. Since Gibts a few songs by the WG, but the one is a matter of taste and, second, normal.

We now see times from the fact that you could ever talk about "pop music", both good and bad, and the Roller the Wise Guys in the whole and much more.
What I have overthrown me, the a cappella was - pop vocal distinction.
because it too often for my taste has been thrown under strange ideas in this forum with the two words around. For
my Verständis is a a cappella desinate for the occupation, sung in what way a piece of music. And pop vocal is a certain style or genre, which is dependent then a cappella (ie vocal) performed. Grob.
I just mention this I again quickly there on the edge. Mainly because there connected with enthusiastic response was. And I do not want that " pop vocal a label for Wise Guys a cappella and is a excuse for moderate Beatbox or Vocal Percussion is ...
"For grade if we now as a" vocal pop "means (and yes is now no time Wise Guys invention), and no longer in the" classic "a cappella will fall rail grade then you should also agree the drums.
Of course it's "just" a rhythm instrument, but a drum is dependent not just another drum. And Wise Guys mouth drum has a drum not much in common, in contrast to the others. Where you of course the difference between should think Percussion and beatboxing . What is more of an art form then (ie beatboxing ), but also in the a cappella area is not as strong Kienbaum is. And
grade based pop music but also to rhythm and danceable , right? Since I do not know why there can be no strong percussion with?
But yes, ne certain simplicity and the Ohrgängigkeit is of course at. And would

ma quite apart from virtually all other groups have their own pieces, which might still work better with a band than the the Wise Guys because numal strongly depend on the text and wit and less on the music ... But that is
too sometimes always ne matter what kind of music you might like "If my comment to




." DeSoto wrote ".

For me, however Vocal Pop and Acapella not synonymous anymore, but indeed a double different directions from me the Vocal pop a lot more appealing. For acapella you have to have been prominent voices in the WG can at most show Nile. If you however Maybebop sounds in which we hear so much her vocal training, that's easy for me vocally ne different league. But like the humor in the WG better, which now are also much approachable for the masses as maybebop . I also think that their songs with music band performed would lose significantly. These are tailored mE too much on the votes of guys and their sounds . They would lose much of atmosphere I'm afraid.
...
The WG had also hair-raising - at least to my ears - Cover Songs at the beginning ...

Here we have, the issue of the Different terms again mentioned explicitly. The a cappella and pop vocal are not synonyms should really be clear. But there the following statement fits so not to my understanding. And now we have finally arrived in my Erklärbärorgie ;)
The thing with the cover versions and instrumental suitability other a cappella groups, we can sometimes almost a bit overlooked. After all, is already interesting and significant that the Wise Guys also of others (who supported) page no high vocal quality is said ... ;)
And kindly came later still the trailer with the Wise Guys covers. Because I wanted to tell you when it notes that with the cover versions in the early days at maybebop , on Wise Guys is not so different.
Quite apart from that I like Cooverversionen quite happy, so wenns good arrangements are. Furthermore, we had also spoken elsewhere times, often I like them better than the original. For me it is mainly because I think that the voice is usually a much more direct has access to the heart and therefore represent mainly ballads me much more if it is purely a cappella are occupied. (Briefly summarized;) and I can talk about it forever ...)
Nu , but in the end that's ne whole different discussion. Whether you covers may not have even not so much to do with the groups in general. The a cappella
/ vocal - pop / vox - pop / whatever - term thing ok. There are were so different ideas in the room.
And so I've had since then "small and very briefly once again point out the" a cappella "no music and no" singing style "or whatever. Only ne occupation form ..."

Then came the question of a definition for 'occupation form "and" Serena "wrote:

Why is not seen as" music "? Yes, you can within a-cappella offer everything from classical to House and Techno . So far so good. But A-cappella sounds - m. E. - always a bit different than instrumental music, as can the Percussion be excellent. And that's what I appreciate it. Why shall not be considered "music"?

And now my quasi cited Erklärbärpart , with supporting counter-quotations;):

DeSoto wrote:

Define cast form.

A cappella = no instruments? ;) Busy so only through song.
So anyway today. Klaro , which once had ne little bit different meaning.
not as clearly defined as SATB (or something like content) but definitely not er ... "Symphony orchestra and mixed chorus" They are only statements about the cast and says nothing about the music. Or, any combination of vocals, bass, trumpet and guitar to the same music?

And why I believe that the direction is not music?

Serena wrote:

But A-cappella sounds - m. E. - always a bit different than instrumental music, as can the Percussion be excellent. And that's what I appreciate it. Why shall not be considered "music"?

Actually sies said it himself ..
You put yes but not all instrumental music in a pot, right? " instrumental" is not much of a genre ...
spiritual intermediate as classical a cappella choral works is still definitely a miles of difference now times example the pieces of House Jacks (and incidentally are the really everything compositions , especially in the Lord DeSoto ;))) As between a symphony and a piece of Beatle. For example.
And a greater than between the different things as it is for string quartets. And there would not have the idea "String Quartet" as a style of music to call. Although there apart from the well-defined cast and the music style on the whole in a similar direction too.
There's still a cappella open wide for different styles of music. It is now time to make groups, jazz, classical ensembles, large choirs and small pop bands, so the times mentioned " vocal pop " which means no more than pop music to be provided only through song, and nix on to testify singing quality ...
Or?

There was but apparently not yet out, my last act for today was this:

DeSoto wrote:

OK so I have understood your concept. It is interesting that acapella originally even instrumental music was used. You call it cast form I call it music music without instruments.

Puh , na least I can rejoice that I could understand seemingly express :) But it requires

yes apparently still requires further explanation. Since I let me ask non long ...

As you can see, language is all changing. Klaro . But for a long time called "a cappella " happens to be the music without instruments. He says it ourselves. But grade that includes it but as a genre. Or is "Music with Intsrumenten " (ie the opposite) a style of music?
And, there are people who generally listen to any "music instruments"?
Nor would I say that someone just "music without instruments" hear. I do not know anyone who likes any form of a cappella and I take myself out of there either. Yeomen for example, who do (for my non-existing expertise in terms of direction) Punk Rock (holding in a cappella what sets him apart from others of course). So, and I like that do not fit. Neither in nor in any other occupation.
For that I like but also plenty of things that are not occupied a cappella , if I find the general direction of the music (including Jazz, no matter how busy). Of course you can then refine still, I like to keep singing rather than piano, so like me " vocal jazz " more than the music of a different jazz pianist.

And the thing also mentioned before that Geang me direct and emotional, it just has music, the a cappella , or at least with (gutem! and this is often at a cappella times now than in the case of other music) voice is carried forward is always a lot easier for me.

DeSoto wrote:

But I would not call a choir as acapella . A Bach Choir is a Bach choir and no acapella music. I think since you did the wrong choir .

If this choir now, but once an a cappella Work (and of course none with instrumental accompaniment ) lists, then is how it is and has nothing to do with wrong doing .
The choir is of course no a cappella music, but in doubt, a large mixed choir. The Bach piece is an a cappella piece or even none. This describes the way it is occupied and not the style. And not even the style of the choir . If he does otherwise I can understand for themselves that also (slowly) but live in musical understanding our time is it how it is. And thus an error in his vocabulary;)

Just as a symphony orchestra can play Beethoven, it can also play the soundtrack of Pirates of the Caribbean. The cast remains the same, but you agrees with me but it's a different style?
And the chorus can perform with orchestras such as the Carmina Burana , or (a cappella ) secular love songs from which composers ever. It must not necessarily change the music style, but it does the occupation. And the chorus is changed but nothing, neither of which would " wrong" to do.
And whether singing Swingle Singers or an orchestra Bach, or play does not change the genre, the style. Bach remains "Classic", or rather baroque music;) Where this is too broad, because not all from one epoch is necessarily the same music style. But the cast is quite different. Once shut concerned orchestra, the other times a cappella .
When Swingles all then jazz up , changes course, the music and style, but this could be the orchestra as well.

And one more thing, yes it should be noticed that I like muSix very happy. The
're basically ne a cappella group, namely to connect without instruments. I like totally love their music (currently semi-private half and cover, starting next year, then at least on record, only their own). That is not necessarily the only cappella existence.
For, in June I had beeen at Concerts muSix that was not a cappella. (Where I do notice about this "microcosm thing" I have not even posted anything! Was there the so absolutely amazing, awesome and all!)
There they are (instrumental) together with a friend's band performed. Both normally do Rock / Pop, which she did there, too. The music has changed non. They still rock and pop made things to keep together. And in case there was nothing a cappella. Solo, to fifth-unanimous voice, drums, piano, keyboards, electric bass, electric and acoustic Guitar.
So, I liked it huge. First, the votes of five because I now totally happy einfachmal like it, but also because I like their music . First, it covers the tracks (for the most part their personal favorite songs), on the other, the original compositions. And I mags in both ensembles, a cappella, or instrumented. The
nothing changes other genre of things. Of course, is not exactly the same piece, but that's nunmal in the occupation and the nature of things that each instrument sounds different.
A violin is not a piano, a piano is not a drum, a drum does not sound, and the tenor is not a vote (for example), because the voice is only a tool somewhere.
And some sounds just different when the piano is played as if it is sung as if it whistles ...

So, I think we all have clarified what we mean, right?
to And the thing with the a cappella like that is something for every abandoned.
Pure piano music I like with a few exceptions, mostly not, and then also has nothing to do with the style, I do not care whether there is played jazz, pop or a piece from the Romantic period. It has something to do with the occupation.
And a cappella music I like mostly containing more than instrumental, at least when the whole direction of my music fits. As I said, that was the case with the instrument "voice". I just like the best and the fastest access to my heart, my soul (sentimental) and simply the most natural. Why do we sing because somehow when we all feel comfortable?

But sometimes, the fact that a cappella is making a piece but also interesting for me, just because it is a style of music that is not me. Techno pieces of Juicebox I find fascinating, that 's a fine art and makes the music exciting again, which usually techno for me so absolutely did not. What is technology anyway? Tools are there, too real to not be so, huh? ;) New discussion ... But
It also gibgt containing enough things that I do really like to see are thick with instruments. It also depends on the style of music.
right thing "classic ham" with great orchestras and all the bells and drann (eg "The Symphony of the New World", or most recently for me, "The Seasons" by Haydn), which can not be done "in a cappella", at least can I imagine not graphic.

And (which I had first-degree discussed this afternoon), many pieces of work by the Swingle Singers to me not so good. Degree, the Bach and Mozart stuff. The need to listen to (especially because of the high Sopranos) is already highly concentrated benefits. To simply enjoy as and hear "the way" because I liked better the other styles of music, namely what they currently do, especially in "Singer Songwriter" things ...
again makes the music, the style, the genre of the difference. The occupation is the same. In this case, a cappella.